Saturday, September 24, 2016

GPC report 15 September 2016

GPC Report
For East and West Sussex LMCs
Dr Russell Brown
15 September 2016

The GPC met on 15 September 2016.  We started with a meeting of the GPDF, where various decisions were made and newer members of GPC were utterly confused and nonplussed.

The meeting proper was the first GPC UK meeting and unfortunately I can report very little of it for reasons of confidentiality. Which is frustrating, as ever.  What I can say is that the devolved nations are facing similar problems to us in England and solutions are proving problematic.

The new Executive team for GPC England has been announced with two new members, Dr Mark Sandford-Wood (Devon) and Dr Gavin Ralston from Birmingham.

The failure of pretty much everything and anything Capita are doing was discussed and GPC continues to take both them and NHS England to task about notes transport and everything else. The degree of incompetence in commissioning and delivery is staggering.

In the afternoon we had breakout groups to discuss a variety of topics around how general practice might be supported better and differently.

And that is all I can say I'm afraid.

The official GPC news can be found at the usual bit of the BMA website.

The next GPC meeting is in November.

I hope you have found this report helpful.  Please feedback so that I can ensure my reports are useful.

Dr Russell Brown

Wednesday, August 03, 2016

GPC Report 21 July 2016

GPC Report
For East and West Sussex LMCs
Dr Russell Brown
21 July 2016

The GPC met on 21 July 2016.  Apologies for the delay in getting this out to you, I have been eating and drinking too much with friends in France.  There will be no such excuses for the next report. 

Chaand Nagpaul was re-elected, unopposed, as the Chair of GPC UK and the new post of GPC England.  there have been changes which I have described in previous reports.  For a reminder, check the BMA GPC pages which can be found here.

News about a list cleansing project (again) appeared in the medical press just before the meeting.  the process was apparently to be led by Capita, which I am sure will fill colleagues with a sense of confidence, although confidence may not be the appropriate word.  However there had been no discussion about the process with us and NHS England have apologised.  Any process will need to be discussed with us and we will not accept any proposals which will damage General Practice.

Subsequent to the report about this issue, a motion was passed by GPC, a relatively unusual event.  The motion was as follows, and passed unanimously:

That GPC UK notes how the NHS England commissioned service for Primary Care support in England with Capita has seriously compromised patient safety and caused significant disruption to GP surgeries already under unprecedented workload pressures, and therefore has no confidence with these arrangements.

Furthermore GPC UK insists that the plans for removing patients from practice lists, which may be illegal and discriminatory, should be abandoned and NHS England must commit to discussions with GPC England before any further list management plans are put in place. 

Furthermore, on the day of GPC a significant event came to light regarding the so-called transformation of primary care support services.  Colleagues may have seen an article in Pulse about this issue.  In essence, in some areas where SBS had been providing support (I use the term loosely) it was discovered that a backlog of clinical correspondence and results stretching back over several years remained in storage areas and had not been processed.  The correspondence includes temporary resident forms, duplicate documents or some results and communications about treatment steps.  NHS England have undertaken a clinical review to assess any high risk correspondence.  GPC is discussing a remuneration and support package for practices which are impacted by this event.

The Carr-Hill formula review, due to be implemented in April 2017 has, utterly unsurprisingly, been delayed until 2018.  I will believe it when I see it.

There was further discussion about how to respond to the decisions reached at LMC Conference recently.  These discussions are currently confidential but as ever I will supply more information when I can.

The issue of an indemnity support scheme was discussed.  Conversations with NHS England continue but the current iteration can be found here.  It is a start but not ideal.

The official GPC news can be found at the usual bit of the BMA website.

The next GPC meeting is in September, and every two months thereafter.  So a silver-lining, you will be getting fewer of these from me!

I hope you have found this report helpful.  Please feedback so that I can ensure my reports are useful.  

Dr Russell Brown

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

GPC Report 16 June 2016

GPC Report
For East and West Sussex LMCs
Dr Russell Brown
16 June 2016

The GPC met on 16 June 2016. Apologies for the delay in getting this out to you.
The first meeting after the annual LMC Conference, there was much to discuss. However, as ever, much of the discussion is confidential. Additionally, the afternoon was taken up in part by Subcommittee meetings, though on this occasion the subcommittees were essentially continuing more focussed discussions as a result of the events and debates which had occurred in GPC.
Workload management was discussed and it evident that there is significant common ground between GPC and NHSE, at least in terms of context and a recognition of the crisis that is occurring in General practice. There was considerable discussion around how GPs can or could manage their workload with patient safety in mind, following on from discussions at LMC Conference. This limiting could take several forms and more info will be forthcoming in due course. The Primary Care Hub was discussed in this context too. These are suggested to provide additional capacity when general practice runs out of it. Discussions around he funding of them were varied. Whatever happens, the direction of travel is for these to be in our futures in some form or other. It is important that we not only influence but control those developments.
Colleagues may recall the Quality First templates and information released by GPC in January 2015 (yes, over a year ago). A new web portal providing easy access to the information, which is intended to be updated frequently has been published on the BMA website. A first look impressed me with its ease of navigation and usefulness, not something I have previously noted in iterations of the Bma website.
The rest of the meeting was confidential but covered areas such as the actions necessary following the LMC Conference, the GPFV and the continuing development of the MCP Voluntary contract, which is currently subject to purdah, so expect news shortly after the Referendum.
The next meeting is the first in a new GPC year in July, after the BMA's ARM in Belfast next week. There will be changes to how things work, with GPC UK becoming an entity which meets 2-3 times a year and GPC England meeting 4-5 times. This is part of the changes suggested in the Meldrum review which will hopefully strengthen the LMC/GPC relationship to the benefit of both and our constituents.
The official GPC news can be found at the usual bit of the BMA website.
I hope you have found this report helpful. Please feedback so that I can ensure my reports are useful.
Dr Russell Brown

Thursday, April 21, 2016

GPC report 21 April 2016

GPC Report
For East and West Sussex LMCs
Dr Russell Brown
21st April 2016

The GPC held its latest meeting on 21st April.

NHS England published its "General Practice: Forward View" on the morning of GPC and it formed the major part of the morning session.  It can be found on the NHSE website.   There has been significant input from GPC and work that has been ongoing has been incorporated into the document by NHSE. Nevertheless, although there is much in it which is of promise, the devil is in the detail which is apparent by its absence and the money, though seemingly a large amount, would seem to be inadequate for what is needed.  For this reason, the BMA and GPC declined to "cobadge" the document, a position at variance with that of the RCGP.  It is certainly a starting point and an acknowledgement of the crisis that exists but it is not a rescue package that would be recognisable to most GPs. GPC will engage with NHSE to thrash out the necessary details.  An email has already gone out from Chaand Nagpaul to GPs which is available on the BMA website.  As you might imagine, I have my own views on the document but I would be interested to hear your views so I can properly represent them during discussions at GPC.

The afternoon was taken up considering a report by the GPC reform task group, chaired by previous GPC chair and chair of BMA council Hamish Meldrum. You may recall an extensive and lengthy piece of work has been going on to consider reformation of GPC and how it interacts with and answers to LMCs. This work is near completion and the report will be published next week, with a commentary from the GPC executive team generated by this afternoon's debate, in time to go out with the documents associated with the forthcoming Annual Conference of LMCs. Many of the recommendations require discussion at Conference or by the wider BMA before moving forward.  Some require changes to standing orders and bylaws of the Association. However, several are in the gift of GPC and were decided on at the meeting.  Details are currently embargoed until the paper is formally published. That being the case, there may be a short addendum to my report next week with more details. If anything more illuminating is released from the centre before then, I will let you know.

I hope you have found this report helpful.  Please feedback so that I can ensure my reports are useful.

Dr Russell Brown

Thursday, March 17, 2016

GPC report 17 March 2016

GPC Report
For East and West Sussex LMCs
Dr Russell Brown
17th March 2016

The GPC held its latest meeting on 17th of March.

This month's report is, you might notice, short. There could be several reasons for this, including fatigue, ennui, complacency or irritability. However, because the meeting this month was short, being a morning only with subcommittee meetings in the afternoon and because much of the meeting was considering matters which must currently remain confidential there is little I can say.

We were however joined by Dr A Lupo, the President of UEMO, who described how primary care was in his home country of Italy, where family doctors (independent contractors in the main) are in dispute with their government and who have recently postponed a 48 hour strike to allow negotiations to proceed. 

There was a presentation about DevoManc and how it is moving ahead. It was noticeable that there is much risk involved and that, although we were reassured that GPs are fully engaged, local GPC reps have a different view.

An update on the Urgent Prescription for General Practice campaign was given by Beth McCarron Nash.  It has apparently been quite successful, though I am unclear by what measure. It, together with the Quality First documents, are to be commended to you as they assist you in protecting yourself in various ways.

In the afternoon, the subcommittee I sit on, the Commissioning and Services Development Subcommittee, met.  Unfortunately it mostly discussed specific parts of the same issue as the morning which I am unable to report and so, like the information from the morning session, I am unable to report it. 

And that is, my friends, about all I can tell you from this month!  The next meeting will be in April, with the Annual Conference of LMCs being in May. 

To sign off, I will abuse my position to remind you of a survey being run by my organisation, Resilient GP in collaboration with both GP Survival and Londonwide LMCs, on a suggested rescue package for general practice. At the time of writing it has attracted over 2400 responses (in less than four days).  I would be delighted if you would consider completing the survey, which is not meant to provide any statistically significant output but be a cause of conversation in the corridors of influence. And as several people have asked me about the correct way to rank the questions, please consider whether the most popular song in the charts is called "the number one in the pop parade" or not.  Thank you very much! 

Happy Easter or indeed any other festival you may choose to celebrate or indulge in!

I hope you have found this report helpful.  Please feedback so that I can ensure my reports are useful.  

Dr Russell Brown

Monday, December 21, 2015

GPC report 17th December 2015

GPC Report
For East and West Sussex LMCs
Dr Russell Brown
17th December 2015

The GPC held its latest meeting on 17th of December.

As ever, much of the contract negotiations information imparted to us is confidential. However it is worth noting that the NHS £3.8 billion increase announced in the comprehensive spending review has at least a proportion coming to general practice. Details of how this will be spent are as yet unclear.  Colleagues may be aware that already £1.8 billion has been ear marked to essentially bailout acute trust deficits.

Scotland on the other hand have concluded their negotiations with QOF moving into core payments in 2017. Indeed there is much that could be admired and indeed emulated in the Scottish agreement.

A survey undertaken by the BMA on the primary-care infrastructure fund found that the situation is fraught with delays and threats even to funding approved schemes. There seems to be some difficulty with NHS England realising that they need to be funding revenue costs going forward rather than simply providing a pot of money at the outset

Indemnity costs have been considered but seemingly only superficially: £2 million has been ear marked by NHS England to help offset the costs of working in an out of hours setting this winter. It is unclear how this will be allocated presently but no doubt that will occur seamlessly and with an elegant simplicity. This obviously won't help in the longer term.

A Multi-specialty Community Provider contract advisory group has been set up. This is not to design a new GP contract but rather to try and properly formulate the environment in which MCPs will work. The presence of the GPC on this group has been moderately effective in emphasising the need for how any contracts will affect primary care to be addressed. The group does not appear to be hostile to general practice.

The atrocious comments written by Professor Steve field in the Daily Mail has resulted in a vote of no confidence by GPC. I have no doubt that, satisfying as it is, absolutely nothing will happen as a result. I understand the Royal College also posted a highly critical response. Quite how he thought this would improve the standing of CQC in the profession's eyes is beyond me.

The Special Conference of Local Medical Committees will occur on 30 January. By the time you read this motions will already have to have been submitted by the LMC. We will see what the agenda committee make of everything but I anticipate that there will be half a dozen themed debates during the day.

In the afternoon there was a presentation by Dr Arvind Madan, the new Director of Primary Care at NHS England. His previous work experience includes being a partner in the Hurley group and being an owner of WebMD. I understand his conflicts-of-interest have been appropriately managed since his appointment in the Department of Health. The presentation was apparently confidential though nothing was said that is not already in the public domain. Given there is a degree of agreement between NHS England and GPC, there was no surprise that much of what he spoke about was to do with workforce and workload. After his presentation there was a question and answer session during which the inestimable Dr Katie Bramall-Stainer from Hertfordshire was extremely clear with him exactly what we all thought. Unaccountably, he was not at the traditional post-December GPC mince pies and mulled wine event.

During the afternoon 4.2% increase in funding for general practice each year for the next few years was announced by NHS England via Pulse Today. Although this has been trumpeted as something of an improvement it actually simply allows us to standstill at current levels of funding taking inflation into account.

The current edition of the official GPC news is available at the BMA communities website here.

Other than that I hope you all have a peaceful and satisfying festive season, however you choose to celebrate it. All of us will be working for at least some of the time over the Christmas period, at a time when many of our patients will no doubt be grateful for our presents (sorry, that was appalling). I am keeping my fingers crossed for an improved 2016!

The next GPC meeting is scheduled for February.

I hope you have found this report helpful.  Please feedback so that I can ensure my reports are useful.
Dr Russell Brown

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

GPC Report 19 November 2015

GPC Report
For East and West Sussex LMCs
Dr Russell Brown
19th November 2015

The GPC held its latest meeting on 19th of November.  

The meeting began with the news of the junior doctors ballot result, which has provided their leaders with an overwhelming mandate going forwards. The unfortunate intransigence displayed by Jeremy Hunt is unhelpful. Since the meeting I understand that the Department of Health have approached ACAS to demonstrate their willingness to engage.  Whether this is with Mr Hunt's knowledge or blessing I know not. 

The meeting ended (I will return to the middle bit in a moment) with a motion being passed unanimously, with the motion being displayed below in an unusual photo from within the BMA Council Chamber. Ordinarily there are automated sentry guns monitoring use of electronic devices by GPC members, authorised to use lethal force against transgressors.

CQC fees consultation: GPs can apparently not be treated differently to any other providers, and given the Government is removing much funding from CQC as they should be self funding (as in, paid for by us) they have suggested a seven-fold increase in fees, phased in over either two or four years. Given the incompetence of the organisation, the lack of any evidence of benefit whatsoever and the huge cost the very concept of such an increase is staggering.  The DH has apparently found £15M down the back of the Departmental sofa with which to reimburse GPs, but we are not entirely sure either how they have calculated this nor whether that money is recurrent and adjustable for future increases assuming CQC continues to exist in some form. I should perhaps say that I have no idea whether there are any plans to scrap it but I live in hope. In fact I was asked by one of the patient representative observers at GPC what I thought the CQC should be replaced by. I suggested that the millions wasted would be better spent on patient care and supporting services towards excellence rather than wielding a punitive clipboard. Inspection regimes are a waste of time: if you inspect and a service is good, why bother? And if it is bad or worse, you've missed the boat and should have intervened earlier.

The Premises Infrastructure fund is proving interesting. Schemes and payments will be allowed to slip but there is an intention by NHS England to make sure the entire billion is spent but how that will equate to local procedures is uncertain.  Going forward, bids will need to be made by CCGs and not practices.  This does not seem unsensible, as any new building will need to be designed with local needs and priorities in mind.

The escalating costs of indemnity for GPs is a matter of concern not only for GPC but also NHS England and the DH, if only because it is another pressure which will likely stymie their plans if not addressed.  It is being discussed on a regular basis but whether any solutions come of it remains to be seen.

Reducing bureaucracy has taken a step forward with the announcement by Jeremy Hunt recently, as a direct result of conversation between him and GPC representatives, that hospitals will in future not ask for a further referral if a patient fails to attend an appointment. I understand there is to be a clause written into the standard hospital contract, which I am sure will be a great comfort to you all.

A meeting with my own organisation, Resilient GP, was reported. Though we were described as a pressure group when we are actually educational and supportive, the meeting was useful for both organisations and, unsurprisingly, there was to quote Chaand a "staggering amount of common ground”.

A contract working group has been set up by NHS England.  This is not to discuss and sort out the GMS/PMS contracts but to discuss a way forward for the new Multi-speciality community provider models, considering both how they can be contracted to provide services and how organisations such as General Practices might fit into them without there being too much destabilisation.  Indemnity issues have been raised again and there is recognition within the NHS that this will cause significant problems for them if not resolved.  Numerous solutions have been proposed but all come at a not inconsiderable cost.

Negotiations for the GP Contract 2016/17 have begun and almost immediately stopped again until after the details of the comprehensive spending review are formally announced.  Colleagues will be aware of the announcement on Tuesday 24 November of an extra £3.8 billion.  Interestingly, a quick back of an envelope calculation would suggest that, with the changes to National Insurance contributions being brought in, roughly £2 billion of that will head straight back to the Treasury…

A Special Conference of LMCs has been announced, likely to take place in January or February 2016.  The LMC office has already written to practices about it and more details will be shared in due course.  I am sure this will be on the agenda for LMC meetings in the next couple of months.

GPC is also looking at how to encourage more Early career GPs into medical politics, to improve the number of less experienced GPs and motivate and develop the leaders of the future.

There was a discussion about how an activity based GP contract might be made to work, after last yer’s LMC conference passed a motion proposed by Kent LMC suggesting it as a way forward.  I find it difficult to see how this can be progressed, given it doesn’t fit with the current direction of travel espoused by both the DH and Government but it is being examined.

The “official” GPC news can be found at the BMA Communities website. 

The next GPC meeting is scheduled for December. 

I hope you have found this report helpful.  Please feedback so that I can ensure my reports are useful.  Feedback is always appreciated

Dr Russell Brown